Over past several years, SERC has been involved in a planning study for the California Energy Commission. Called Renewable Energy Secure Communities (RESCO), the purpose of the project is to create a strategic plan for Humboldt County to meet a majority of its energy needs with local renewable resources. The primary conclusion of the study is that it is technically and economically feasible to achieve a very high penetration of local renewable energy sources, but no single resource is capable of reaching that goal on its own. We must pursue multiple resources simultaneously, and the most practical ones are biomass, wind, hydropower, and energy efficiency.
Right now, Shell Wind is proposing the development of 25 wind turbines on Bear River Ridge, five miles south of the City of Ferndale, just inland from Cape Mendocino. The farm would produce enough renewable electricity to power 22,000 Humboldt County homes, about 10% of our countywide electricity use.
The proposed Bear River Wind Project would bring several positive developments to Humboldt County:
The Bear River Ridge Wind Project has sparked considerable local dialogue. Here we respond to the most common questions and concerns we've received about the project. We've also included a set of links to additional resources about the project and wind power in general.
There are two valid ways to look at electricity production from the proposed wind farm and its consumption, physically and in business terms.
Physically - All of the power generated by the Bear River Wind Project would be consumed locally in Humboldt County.
Even at full capacity (50MW), the wind farm would never produce more electricity than can be consumed locally (our minimum county load is 70MW), so the power will always get used up locally. It is technically possible to export electricity from our region, but PG&E is the only local entity that has the ability to make exports occur (by ramping up the Humboldt Bay Power Plant). However, in today's wholesale market, PG&E would lose money if it tried to sell Humboldt Bay natural gas power to the greater California grid, so they don't.
Business Transactions - Depending on who purchases the electricity from Shell Wind, some or none of the power will be resold to Humboldt County residents.
Shell Wind is not a utility, so they must find someone willing to purchase the power from Bear River Ridge. If PG&E purchases the electricity, then legally every PG&E customer shares equally in the consumption of that power. Humboldt County represents about 1% of PG&E's customer base, so local residents would legally be consuming about 1% of the power from the Bear River Wind Project. If Shell Wind sells the power to another entity, then legally the electricity we buy from PG&E would not include the local wind energy.
Regardless of the business status of the power, the presence of the wind farm will make Humboldt County more energy secure.
Some of the towers will have red warning beacons for aircraft safety. These beacons will look essentially identical to the red beacons on radio and cell towers (e.g. the towers on the hill above Kneeland or the towers near Fay Slough and Murray Field in Northern Eureka).
Light pollution is not a concern because of the color of the lights. Red light does not scatter nearly as strongly as white or blue light (which is why the sky is blue) and the human eye is much less sensitive to red light than other colors (which is why red flashlights are used for star gazing).
It depends. Wind power definitely decreases consumption of fossil fuels. The energy generated by the Bear River Ridge Wind Project will displace natural gas consumption at PG&E’s Humboldt Bay power plant.
However, wind power is intermittent, which means that a single wind farm cannot be relied upon to provide energy at any specific point in time. In contrast, fossil powered electricity is dispatchable, which means that a plant can increase or decrease output at will. We must maintain dispatchable sources of power.
Many sources of renewable energy can be dispatchable, such as hydropower, geothermal and biomass. In addition, energy storage facilities, charged during periods of excess availability, can be used to deliver renewable energy during periods of deficit. So fossil power generation could be replaced entirely by a combination of intermittent and dispatchable renewable sources.
The evidence does not support this claim.
A study recently published by Hoen et. al. (2011) concluded that there was no statistically significant impact on property values due to wind farms:
“This paper has investigated the potential impacts of wind energy facilities on the sales prices of residential properties that are in proximity to and/or that have a view of those wind facilities. In so doing, three different potential impacts of wind facilities on property values have been identified and analyzed: scenic vista stigma, area stigma, and nuisance stigma. The results are based on the most comprehensive data on and analysis of the subject to date. [No] statistical evidence of the presence of these stigmas was found for the 24 wind facilities and 7,459 residential real estate transactions included in the sample.”
Solar photovoltaic (PV) is a very promising technology that has some important advantages over other renewable energy resources. In particular, the environmental impact of residential scale PV is relatively low because systems are usually installed on existing buildings, requiring no land-use conversion.
The challenges with PV are the matters of scale and cost. To produce an equivalent amount of annual electricity as the Bear River Ridge Wind Project, every housing unit in Humboldt County (all 61,000) would need to install a 2 kW solar PV array on the roof, and all of those systems would need to be optimally sited and oriented (south-facing, tilted, no shading). In total, those systems would cost 5 times more than the wind farm, over half a billion dollars.
We are emphatic supporters of solar and believe it should be a part of our renewable energy portfolio. But until costs come down much further, it is not the most cost-effective or practical approach to meeting local energy needs with renewables.
Project Specific Resources from SERC:
Other Project Specific Resources:
General Resources: